Published in: 2010
Publisher:
UTS/ISF
Author:
Willets, J., Carrard, N., Retamal, M., Dinh, N., Nam, G., Paddon, M., Thuy, D.X., Trung, N.H., Mitchell, C.
Uploaded by:
SuSanA secretariat
Partner profile:
common upload
4010 Views
12 Downloads
Location of library entry
The study compared four wastewater management alternatives for the new urban area of South Can Tho with an area of 2080 hectares and likely to house more than 250,000 people in the future. The intent was to examine the applicability of recent innovations and international trends in wastewater management. Alternatives considered include centralised treatment (Option 1), decentralised treatment at the scale of several hundred households (Option 2), a combination of centralised and decentralised (Option 3, as shown below) and an option with resource recovery in decentralised areas (Option 4). The resource recovery option involves urine diversion and storage for use as fertiliser in nearby agricultural areas.
Willets, J., Carrard, N., Retamal, M., Dinh, N., Nam, G., Paddon, M., Thuy, D.X., Trung, N.H., Mitchell, C. (2010). Selecting Sanitation Options: A case study of South Can Tho - Technical Report. UTS/ISF
Case studies in other formats English
Share this page on