Economic feasibility within SANIRESCH Project Various Authors (2012)

Comparing the costs for SANIRESCH with today´s costs for conventional wastewater treatment and standard commercial fertiliser, the alternative system is more expensive for both “Office building” and “Agricultural application”. However, the sensitivity analyses show that a certain potential exists. The differences come especially through the higher running costs, which influence is bigger than the higher investment costs. However, the sensitivity analyses show that a certain potential exists. With augmented durability of the spare parts of the NoMix toilets in combination with reduced investment costs of sanitary equipment, the system can reach the cost level of a conventional system. The economic feasibility analysis of the agricultural application showed that both alternative fertilisers are more expensive. Today fertilisation with urine can be economic feasible when the framing conditions such as land prices are adequate, which is not the case in Eschborn. If higher automation of the MAP precipitation is achieved the system can become economically feasible as well. To achieve this, the production costs have to stay below those for commercial phosphorus fertiliser. This requires a continuation of research and development for the MAP production.

1. Lisa-Marie Bischer (Technical University of Darmstadt) investigated in her bachelor thesis the economic feasibility of the sustainable sanitation system SANIRESCH and compared it with a conventional system
2. Christina Braum (Justus Liebig University in Gießen) looked into the costs for logistics dealing with urine and MAP
3. Andrés Lazo Paéz (Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg) examined the economic feasibility of the sanitary in-house installations in SANIRESCH compared to a conventional system

The principal lead of this focus point was GIZ. GIZ worked together with the University of Bonn in assessing the feasibility of urine reuse.

Project outputs regarding economic feasibility studies of the new sanitary system in house 1 of the GIZ as well as the logistics of urine/MAP can be accessed here.

Bibliographic information

Various Authors (2012). Economic feasibility within SANIRESCH Project

Filter / Tags

OtherFactsheets and policy briefsPresentationsEnglishGerman

Downloads

Bachelor Thesis Economic Feasibility


Type: application/pdf
Size: 2.05 MB

Download

Bachelor Thesis Logistics


Type: application/pdf
Size: 1.07 MB

Download

Factsheet economic feasibility


Type: application/pdf
Size: 0.97 MB

Download

Master Thesis In-house Installations


Type: application/pdf
Size: 3.49 MB

Download

Presentation Bachelorarbeit Economic Feasibility (DE)


Type: application/pdf
Size: 0.62 MB

Download

Presentation Bachelorarbeit Logistics (DE)


Type: application/pdf
Size: 0.59 MB

Download

Presentation economic feasibility (DE)


Type: application/pdf
Size: 0.3 MB

Download

Presentation Masterarbeit In-house Installations (DE)


Type: application/pdf
Size: 0.58 MB

Download

Economic feasibility

Published in: 2012
Pages: 0

Publisher:

Author(s):
Various Authors

Uploaded by:

Stay in Touch Become a Member

Register for free as a SuSanA member to engage with thousands of sanitation enthusiasts on the forum, join working groups, and explore regional chapters.

Subscribe

Are we allowed to crumble with cookies and anonymous tracking?

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site (so called session cookies), while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). We use the application Matomo and the external service etracker to analyze your behavior on our website anonymously. Because we value your privacy, we are here with asking your permission to use the following technologies. You can change your settings any time via this link or the menu item in footer menu. For more information visit our Data Policy